----------------------------------
21. Please limit information about the children's school. Do not post links to the site, the name, location, or specifics about school events.
----------------------------------
I don't mean to keep harping on GWOP's rules, but seriously, this is getting ridiculous. There's yet another new rule. We're now up to 21 rules. If I wind up having to make another tutorial, y'all, I am NOT going to be happy.
Rule 21 is also one of those rules about behavior that's so obviously wrong that it shouldn't have to be a stated or written rule. It's similar to rules like "Don't kill people","Don't bite the hand that feeds you", "Flush the Toilet", "Re-Fill the Paper in the Printer", and "Just Wait for the Next Elevator Instead of Shoving your Briefcase Between the Doors and Making The Rest of Us Wait Even Longer, you self-absorbed jackass. We were running late too."
And finally, I feel compelled to ask --- isn't GWOP a moderated forum? Sharla, just don't publish the crap from idiots that shouldn't be posted. Or, if you don't want stupid people reading and posting at your blog, why not re-state the rule more clearly. Here's a suggestion:
--------------------------------
21. If you're so stupid to type information about the children's school, links to the site, the name, location, or specifics about school events, please find some sort of long, sharp object and lunge it into your thick skull. There's something wrong with you. Don't visit this blog anymore. Quit reading here. Move along. Get professional help.
--------------------------------
Rules for Posting
Click here for iwhyawli's tongue-in-check version of GWOP's 954,012 posting rules. If you're wondering why GWOP has so many posting rules, you're not alone.
Free Tutorial
..
Free Tutorial
..
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
I think the moderators at GWOP should keep all posts off their blog. They are all silly posts anyway.
I don't know why I ever slum it over at the hate sites, other than the fact that I have a limited interest in understanding the evolution of the mentally ill, but I can only take it for a few minutes.
Kate Gosselin-haters' IQs dip when they do things like this.
Uh, maybe if people would act like normal human beings instead of dumb ass hypocrites full of hate, venom, and down right stupidity they wouldn't need so many blasted rules! I mean, who would actually need to be told not to name call where the kids are concerned? Just the lame ass GWOP'ers. duh.
Well that's just rich. No information about the school? Ha! I was lurking on their inane chat room*** yesterday and they had a "Mom from the tups' preschool" on talking about the teachers, the class size, the Christmas program, the tups birthday party. She was a complete and obvious fake, like pennmommy. The "owner" of the chat room, Mamacat, scolded anyone who suggested that the lies were lies. I think Mamacat was Sharla/Peri because she showed the same twisted logic they have--- lying is ok, BUT calling someone out for lying is NOT polite. At least three gwoppers in there tried to point out that the mom's story was contradictory, but Mamacat was quick to defend and even suggest new lies.
So the gwop rule is--- no information about the school should be published, except completely fabricated hogwash about gossipy teachers and Kate Gosselin's atrocious behavior.
Who could take Sharla seriously?
***I do not endorse lurking in that chat room unless you suffer from severe insomnia. The only good that could possibly come out of it is that the ensuing boredom will help you get a good night's rest.
http://perezhilton.com/2009-09-02-kate-glamelin
just because the haters will dislike it.
:)
That "mom" was back in that chatroom, sucking up to the "Haters", trying to prove who she was, by sharing photographs of the kids in the class. I guess some of the "Haters" did not believe her, so she just HAD to prove it to them by showing them the photographs and blabbing about the family, the kids included. This "mom" even went so far to pinpoint herself in pictures, at the birthday party, that were published on the Internet, and all the "Haters" were admiring her "rear end". I mean how low can you go, what a "sellout", just so she could be allowed in the "Hate" circle. Of course, the "Haters" played her like a deck of cards and they were thrilled that they got to dissect some more trivial information. Who gives a shit that this "mom" bought the kids three D chalk. Man oh man, you can't make this shit up.
All other blogs that I go to have no rules-or maybe one, Be Nice. It's the job of moderators to enforce a civil and safe discussion.
I've always wondered if all those gwop rules are listed as a potential defense in case of a lawsuit. I'm no lawyer but I don't think that would work.
Anonymous said...
All other blogs that I go to have no rules-or maybe one, Be Nice. It's the job of moderators to enforce a civil and safe discussion.
I've always wondered if all those gwop rules are listed as a potential defense in case of a lawsuit. I'm no lawyer but I don't think that would work.
September 5, 2009 1:51 PM
----------------------------------
That does make sense. I wonder if those rules would hold up in a court of law. Sharla should ask her daughter.
By the way that Sharla is a busy woman advocating for those Gosselin children. First GWOP and then the piggy blog, now the chat room that she started. She has so many alias I wonder how she keeps track of them all...Ah but you know she did have that slip up on the piggy blog. She is MamaCat one day AgedOne the next...who will she be tomorrow? I wonder if this is all going to catch up to these "gals" one day. One can only hope.
How could that "mom" have pictures of the class to show when her whole story was about how the Gosselin kids are not allowed to be in any pictures??? Where are the pictures???
Post a Comment